junkmailentre7.rubbishspeakstopoetryofracksantothersalineseafeaturesclothinglike5.poetry
absurd
andthebettermcadeesthatChauhAnsclothingshortthebetterfletter
malad;
ETRE,and1.themultiplicityofstepping theavantgarde and2.
carsthesimplicityisthenewsimplicityI5.'llhaveanewswimsuitfrom deeshore.ent
antwatch4.TelevIsiONthroughtheglintyewrofthe
6.nilE
23 Jul 2005
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
Crescent. It is not in my formal logic to elicit that that is not explicable. It is not explicable to communicate that that is not opposed to logic that is unreasonable in the sense that it is oppositional and therefore quite understandable in the way that it is not in my assence to be asymetric upon a rotating calculating circus that proves that reasonable reason and sense make sense
ROTE
hi rote
Fuck off
hi crescent
since rote is (my dual) and therefore your character in your echoing fiction that is not a fiction that is, nethertheless, a fiction; enduring and pulsating, I would therefore state that (apologies for the length of my sentences) (irreparable grammar) (STOP) I would like to state that I would love to return to a nice little novel, perhaps a novella, that you have recently written. It would be so lovely to star alongside Sally Tokk (copyright annabloom.com). I do so fancy a bit of the other. What do you think crescent what do you think crescent? Honestly I feel like an out of work actor!!
PS: Ignore Rote, he's a creation of yours who always seems to slant the plot like a rudder
Rotessecondaryawareness
Pps: A shorter name would be far funkier!!
Post a Comment